When comparing A36 (ASTM) and S235JR (EN 10025) steels for structural frames, key differences arise in their standards, mechanical properties, chemical composition, and regional applicability. Below is a detailed comparison to guide material selection:
1. Standards and Regional Use
| Property | A36 (ASTM A36/A36M) | S235JR (EN 10025-2:2019) |
|---|---|---|
| Region | Predominantly used in North America. | Common in Europe and projects adhering to EN standards. |
| Standard Focus | ASTM emphasizes tensile strength requirements. | EN standards prioritize yield strength and impact toughness. |
2. Mechanical Properties
| Property | A36 | S235JR |
|---|---|---|
| Yield Strength | ≥ 250 MPa (36 ksi) | ≥ 235 MPa (34 ksi) |
| Tensile Strength | 400–550 MPa (58–80 ksi) | 360–510 MPa (52–74 ksi) |
| Elongation | ≥ 20% (in 200 mm) | ≥ 26% (in 5.65√S₀) |
| Impact Toughness | Not specified (generally lower). | 27 J at **+20°C** (Charpy V-notch). |
Key Takeaway:
A36 has higher tensile strength but lower elongation than S235JR.
S235JR guarantees better impact toughness at room temperature, making it suitable for dynamic loads.
3. Chemical Composition
| Element | A36 (Max %) | S235JR (Max %) |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon (C) | 0.26% | 0.17% |
| Manganese | 0.80–1.20% | 1.40% |
| Phosphorus | 0.04% | 0.035% |
| Sulfur | 0.05% | 0.035% |
Key Takeaway:
S235JR has lower carbon content, improving weldability and reducing brittleness.
A36 allows higher sulfur/phosphorus (more prone to hot cracking during welding).
4. Applications
A36:
Common in US buildings, bridges, and general fabrication.
Used for beams, columns, and plates where moderate strength suffices.
S235JR:
Popular in European structural frames, machinery, and welded components.
Preferred for projects requiring better weldability and toughness.
5. Cost and Availability
A36: Widely available in the US; lower cost due to simpler production.
S235JR: More common in Europe; may incur higher costs in regions where EN-grade steels are less accessible.
6. Other Considerations
Welding:
S235JR’s lower carbon content reduces preheating requirements.
A36 may need preheating for thick sections or strict weld quality.
Corrosion Resistance: Neither grade is corrosion-resistant; both require coatings (e.g., galvanizing) for harsh environments.
Machinability: Similar due to comparable hardness (~137–149 HB).
Summary: Which to Choose?
Choose A36 if:
Your project is in North America or follows ASTM standards.
Higher tensile strength is critical.
Cost and availability are priorities.
Choose S235JR if:
Your project follows European standards (e.g., Eurocodes).
Weldability, elongation, and impact toughness are key.
Dynamic or cyclic loading is expected.
References
ASTM A36/A36M – Standard Specification for Carbon Structural Steel.
EN 10025-2:2019 – Hot-rolled products of structural steels.
Manufacturer datasheets (e.g., ArcelorMittal, SSAB).
For critical applications, always consult material test certificates or conduct mechanical/chemical testing.
Just like you, 70% customers choose long-term cooperation with BBN steel not only for our good product and service quality, good reputation in the international market, but also for our experienced one-stop raw material supply and further steel processing!
